Assessment, Reassessment and the Faceless Process
Most tax cases are decided at the assessment stage. What the appellate authorities do is largely constrained by what was said, and what was documented, in response to the first notice. The faceless process made that more true rather than less, because there is no hearing in which to repair a weak written submission.
- How the faceless process actually works
- Reassessment time limits after they were cut
- The closed list of things that can reopen a year
- What to do in the first week after a notice
What it changed in practice
Faceless assessment sat at section 144B of the 1961 Act and is carried into section 273 of the 2025 Act, which holds the operative framework for faceless assessment, reassessment and recomputation, with the procedure in rule 176 of the Income-tax Rules 2026. Section 260 is a narrower provision than it is often described as: it enables faceless schemes for specified information-gathering and inspection functions, not faceless proceedings generally. The Act uses separate provisions for different faceless functions rather than one enabling section. For an eligible assessee the draft order and Dispute Resolution Panel mechanism sits in section 275, with the draft-order requirement at 275(1) and the right to object at 275(2).
The practical consequences are worth stating plainly, because they change how a response should be prepared.
The written submission is the case
There is no officer across a desk who can be talked through an explanation. Everything the decision-maker will see is what was uploaded. A submission that assumes context will be supplied orally will not be understood.
Documents must be self-explaining
An annexure that would be obvious to someone familiar with the business is not obvious to a unit that has never seen it. Label, index and explain what each document proves.
Timelines are unforgiving
Response windows are short and adjournment is not a conversation. Diarising the date the notice was issued, not the date it was noticed, is the discipline that matters.
A personal hearing is by request and by video
It exists, and it is worth requesting where the matter turns on something hard to convey in writing. It is not automatic.
Shorter, and gated
The reassessment regime was rebuilt with effect from 1 September 2024 and the time limits were cut substantially from the previous ten-year outer limit.
| Step | Ordinary case | Where escaped income is ₹50 lakh or more |
|---|---|---|
| Show cause notice before reopening, under section 281 | Within 3 years | Within 5 years |
| Reopening notice, under section 280 | Within 3 years and 3 months | Within 5 years and 3 months |
| Sanction | Additional or Joint Commissioner, or Additional or Joint Director | Same |
| Search cases | Carved out into a separate block assessment regime |
The limitation periods run from the end of the relevant tax year. The extra three months on the reopening notice exists so the pre-notice procedure can be completed. It is not a mandatory three-month waiting period between the two notices, and it is often described as one. Note also that the sanction level is uniform whatever the elapsed time.
Under the 2025 Act the provisions are sections 279 to 286: income escaping assessment at 279, notice at 280, procedure before notice at 281, time limit at 282, and limitation, exclusions, sanction and completion at 283 to 286.
The gate itself is worth stating in full, because the short version conceals what has to happen. Before issuing the reopening notice the Assessing Officer must disclose the information suggesting that income has escaped assessment, issue a show cause notice under section 281, consider the response, and pass an order deciding whether this is a fit case for reopening. The substantive notice then issues under section 280 accompanied by that order. Prior approval is required at the level of the Additional or Joint Commissioner or Director. Statutory exceptions apply, including specified search, requisition and survey-related cases.
Section 280(6) is exhaustive. It says that for sections 280 and 281, information suggesting escaped income means the listed matters, and the choice of means rather than includes is what closes the list. Read with section 280(4), which prohibits a reopening notice unless the Assessing Officer holds qualifying information, it is a real constraint and a ground of challenge in its own right.
| The eight categories in section 280(6) | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Risk management strategy | Information on the assessee and the relevant tax year identified under the Board risk management strategy |
| Audit objection | An objection that the assessment was not made in accordance with the Act |
| Treaty or exchange information | Information received under an agreement referred to in section 159 |
| Faceless collection scheme | Information made available under a scheme notified under section 260 |
| Consequential to a Tribunal or Court order | Information requiring action in consequence of such an order, which is narrower than any court or tribunal direction |
| Survey | Information emanating from a survey under section 253, excluding a survey under section 253(4) |
| Approving Panel direction | Directions concerning the assessee given under section 274(6) |
| Findings and directions | A finding or direction in an order by an authority, Tribunal or Court in an appeal, reference or revision under this Act, or by a Court under another law. Broader than findings under another law alone |
Confirmed as an exhaustive statutory definition by our subject matter expert on 17 September 2026.
It is worth reading as a gateway rather than as a narrow one. The risk management category in particular is potentially broad. What the closed list gives a taxpayer is that the Department must still disclose the information through the section 281 show cause process and establish a rational connection between it and the income said to have escaped assessment.
What to do when a notice arrives
1. Establish which Act and which year
A notice relating to a pre-2026 period is a 1961 Act notice however recently it was issued. Getting this wrong at the outset infects every subsequent submission.
2. Diarise from the notice date
Not from the date it was seen. Portal notices are frequently found late and the clock does not wait.
3. Check the gateway before the merits
Whether the notice is within time, properly sanctioned and traceable to a permitted information source is often a better argument than anything on the substance, and it is available only if raised early.
4. Assemble the file before drafting
The response is only as good as the contemporaneous documentation behind it. Documents created after the notice are worth less and are visibly so.
5. Write for a reader who knows nothing
The faceless unit has no history with the business. Assume nothing and explain the commercial context as well as the tax position.
Where to go next
Direct Taxation
Back to the main page: compliance, litigation and strategy, how we work, and how to reach us.
Two Acts, One Year: What the Income-tax Act 2025 Changes
What actually happened on 1 April 2026, the tax year concept that replaced two others, how the transition provisions allocate a period to an Act, and a section mapping table you can work from.
Compliance: Returns, Withholding and the New Form Numbers
Return due dates for the year being filed now, the updated return window, the 2025 withholding rationalisation that removed two compliance checks entirely, and the form renumbering that catches everyone.
Disputes: Appeals, Penalties and Where a Case Is Actually Won
The appellate hierarchy, the monetary limits that decide whether the department appeals at all, the small-case resolution route, the penalty provisions, and the prosecution offences that were softened in 2026.
Planning, Anti-avoidance and Cross-border Positions
Rates and concessional regimes, the general anti-avoidance rule and its grandfathering, treaty positions including the Mauritius protocol that is still not in force, the abolished equalisation levy, and where India actually stands on global minimum tax.
Send an enquiry
If you have a notice, send us the notice itself and the date on it. That determines how fast we need to move and is usually more informative than a description of it.
Position as at 16 September 2026. Reviewed every six months.
This page is general information, not professional advice. India is operating two income tax statutes at once. The Income-tax Act 1961 governs FY 2025-26 and everything before it, including assessments, appeals and updated returns for those years, which will run into the 2030s. The Income-tax Act 2025 came into force on 1 April 2026 and governs tax year 2026-27 onward, with every section renumbered and every form renumbered with them. A statement about Indian income tax that carries neither a year label nor an Act label is not a statement anyone can act on. Take professional advice before acting on anything on this page. We are happy to be that adviser, but we do not act on a web page, ours or anyone else's, without one.